Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Steve Preston
as 09-1161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE PRESTON, Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, JOHN BRAVACOS, Regional Director and JAMES KELLY, Field Office Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2009cv80123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilder v. Preston et al
as 1:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Lawrence V. Wilder
Defendant:
Steve Preston, John Bravacos and James Kelly
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Thornton v. Blake et al
as 3:2008cv00775
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Thornton
Defendant:
Ralph A. Blake, N. Daniel Rogers, III, Steve Preston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv07970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carroll et al v. Preston et al
as 8:2008cv02918
Plaintiff:
Edna Carroll, Lauressa Brown, Eunice McIver and others
Defendant:
Steve Preston, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Central Gardens Associates Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Alexander et al v. Preston
as 5:2008cv00758
Plaintiff:
Tasha Alexander, Tasha Alexander, Tasha Alexander and others
Defendant:
Steve Preston
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
