Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shipman v. Russell et al
as 1:2020cv00614
Defendant:
Unknown Elsworth, Kathryn Russell, Barry County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael Shipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv05460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KING v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
LAURETTA R. KING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Craig Lang, et al v. City of Kalamazoo, MI, et al
as 17-2199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG LANG
Plaintiff:
RYAN DIAMOND, KATHY LANG, BRANDEN DIAMOND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KALAMAZOO, MI, JON SCHIPPER, MATTHEW ELZINGA and others
Defendant:
KELLY PITTELKOW, GERALD BENTLEY, JOHN RESSEGUIE and others
Diamond et al v. Kalamazoo, City of et al
as 1:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
Ryan Diamond , Kathy Lang , Branden Diamond and others
Defendant:
Kalamazoo, City of , Jon Schipper, Matthew Elzinga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Basevitz v. Fremont RE-2 School District et al
as 1:2015cv01095
Plaintiff:
Robert Basevitz
Defendant:
Fremont RE-2 School District, Rhonda Vendetti, Brian Schipper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-16737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
