Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Evans v. Gordon, Ph.D. et al
as 9:2021cv00052
Defendant:
Kristen Wilson, Amiyah Colclough, Claire Opella and others
Plaintiff:
Christin Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
S.M. et al v. Board of Regents of Stephen F. Austin State University et al
as 9:2020cv00203
Plaintiff:
K. W., M. w,, T. R. and others
Defendant:
Board of Regents of Stephen F. Austin State University, Stephen F. Austin State University and Scott Gordon, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCCARTHY et al v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2020cv01395
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PETER HARRIS, GLEN CLAY HIGGINS, MICKIE J. NILAND and others
Defendant:
CHERYL L. JOHNSON, NANCY PELOSI and PAUL D. IRVING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Z.G. et al v. MASTERY CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 2:2018cv04948
Plaintiff:
A.G. and Z.G.
Defendant:
MASTERY CHARTER SCHOOL, SCOTT GORDON, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWHORN v. REGIONAL SCHOOL UNIT 34 et al
as 1:2015cv00159
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LAWHORN
Defendant:
REGIONAL SCHOOL UNIT 34, SCOTT GORDON and BRETT HOOGTERP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Susan Spell v. Judge David Cunningham III et al
as 2:2014cv09806
Defendant:
Judge David Cunningham, III, Does, Judge Scott Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Spell
Fawaz Ghaith v. Don Rauschenberger, Jr., et al
as 11-1780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FAWAZ GHAITH, an Individual
Defendant - Appellee:
DON RAUSCHENBERGER, JR., in his Individual Capacity, MARION BREASBOIS, JERRY BREASBOIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
