Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Alshaary v. c/o Citadel Property Management et al
as 1:2023cv08876
Plaintiff:
Hafad H. Alshaary
Defendant:
c/o Citadel Property Management, Bradurst Condominion Property Management, Mark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 rr Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
John Doe v. The Citadel
as 22-1843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
THE CITADEL, The Military College of South Carolina, GLENN M. WALTERS, in his official capacity at The Citadel, VALERIE MERCADO, in her official capacity at The Citadel and others
Cofield v. The Plaza
as 1:2022cv06584
Defendant:
The Plaza and The Citadel
Plaintiff:
Rickey Cofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Citadel, The et al
as 2:2021cv04198
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Citadel, The, Glenn M Walters, Valerie Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CITADEL WELLWOOD URBAN RENEWAL LLC v. BOROUGH OF MERCHANTVILLE et al
as 1:2021cv16700
Plaintiff:
CITADEL WELLWOOD URBAN RENEWAL LLC
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MERCHANTVILLE, EDWARD F BRENNAN, ANTHONY J PERNO, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00640
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
