Cases 1 - 10 of 196
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jones v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv00733
Defendant:
Yamir Perez, The Kroger Co., Kroger Limited Partnership II and others
Plaintiff:
Anton L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 2:2024cv04247
Defendant:
Rodney McMullen, The Kroger Co., U.S. Protection Service, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Haneef Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv04761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2024cv03854
Plaintiff:
Dawanna K. Taylor
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2024cv02211
Defendant:
Sparky's Consulting & Tactics, LLC and The Kroger Co. doing business as King Soopers
Plaintiff:
Makiba Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05600
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
