Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06832
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ronald Posluns v. Education Management Corp., et al
as 11-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald J. Posluns
Defendant / Appellee:
Education Management Corporation, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Education Management Holdings, LLC which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Education Management Corporation, Argosy Education Group, Inc., Argosy University and others
Ronald Posluns v. Education Management Corp., et al
as 11-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald J. Posluns
Defendant - Appellee:
Education Management Corporation, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Education Management Holdings, LLC which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Education Management Corporation, Argosy Education Group, Inc., Argosy University and others
Posluns v. Education Management Corporation LLC et al
as 4:2010cv01294
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Posluns
Defendant:
Education Management Corporation LLC , Argosy Education Group, Inc , Argosy University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
