Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, in its capacity as servicer for Damimler Trust and Daimler Title Co. v. The City of Pittston et al
as 3:2020cv02260
Defendant:
Hi-Way Auto & Truck Service, Inc., The City of Pittston and Township of Pittston
Plaintiff:
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, in its capacity as servicer for Daimler Trust and Daimler Title Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Clark v. Whaley et al
as 1:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Brent Whaley, Ryna Saylor, Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
ALYSON CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SCHUETT v. CELADON et al
as 1:2018cv01287
Defendant:
CELADON, CELADON GROUP, INC., CELADON LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARTINA SCHUETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
James Arington v. Jonathan Norton, et al
as 17-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES K. ARINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN NORTON, M.D. in his Individual Capacity, MICHAEL SHEA, M.D. in his Individual Capacity, SUMMIT PHYSICAL THERAPY LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00354
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08535
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
