Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Vidal-Ramirez v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Michael Vidal-Ramirez
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Carlton National Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sansone v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Stanley A. Sansone
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office Director and Kathi Vidal
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dominguez v. Lunsford et al
as 2:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Vidal Dominguez
Defendant:
Brad Lunsford and The Cityof Las Cruces
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Vidal v. Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2023cv01781
Plaintiff:
Francisco Vidal
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office, Petterson-Smith P.D. and Darin F. Imlay P.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Vidal-Rodriguez v. MEC Engineering PSC
as 3:2023cv01519
Plaintiff:
Luis Miguel Vidal-Rodriguez
Defendant:
MEC Engineering PSC doing business as MEC Engineering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
