Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00526
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Oliver v. Sagan et al
as 3:2014cv01048
Plaintiff:
James W. Oliver
Defendant:
Scott A. Sagan and Town of Simsbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chuang et al v. Rosenski et al
as 2:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Charles Chuang and Kay Kim
Defendant:
Donald W Rosenski , W Oliver , Anthony Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
CHUANG et al v. ROSENSKI et al
as 1:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CHUANG and KAY KIM
Defendant:
KAREN FREEMAN-WILSON, W OLIVER, DONALD W ROSENSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chuang et al v. Rosenski et al
as 2:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Charles Chuang and Kay Kim
Defendant:
Donald W Rosenski , W Oliver , Anthony Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sandra Wakamatsu v. Robert W. Oliver, D.D.S. and D, et al
as 12-16079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA WAKAMATSU
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. OLIVER, D.D.S. AND DAVID M. PERRY, D.D.S., INC. and ROBERT W. OLIVER, D.D.S. AND DAVID M. PERRY, D.D.S., INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
Ellis et al v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv01874
Plaintiff:
Da'Von'Ta Ellis and Clarence W. Oliver
Defendant:
Prince George's County, Maryland, Prince George's County Board of Education, John E. Deasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
