Cases 1 - 10 of 227
Victora Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Clive Davis et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Clive Davis, Saviii 3rd, The Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Westbrook v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Lula Westbrook
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Kevin Farmer and Scott Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Parker et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Bianca McKinney
Defendant:
Westbrook J. Parker and Robert J. Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
v. Erwine et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Defendant:
Michael Erwine, United States of America, Churchill County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Erwine v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Erwine
Defendant:
United States of America, Churchill County, Benjamin Trotter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Reaves v. National Law Enforcement et al
as 1:2023cv02836
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
National Law Enforcement, Bill Phillips, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
