Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Tepe v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, United States, Rebecca Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mawule Tepe v. Lucille Nelson, et al
as 23-6095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCILLE LATTIMORE NELSON, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. and WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Mawule Tepe v. Whirlpool Customer Experience Center, et al
as 23-6085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE CENTER, aka Whirlpool cXc, PATTON MUSICK, MONICA J. CULPEPPER and others
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-6086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States District Court Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mawule Tepe v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 23-6093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, MARK JONES and DAKIA TAYLOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
