Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Eleanore Kue, et al v. Janice Waldmiller, et al
as 23-2100
Plaintiff:
ELEANORE KUE, SIMON KUE and HIS HEALING HANDS URGENT CARE CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
SAMUEL NORTH, in his individual and official capacity, BRETT BRICE, in his individual and official capacity, BENJAMIN GARRISON, in his individual and official capacity and others
Ousley et al v. St. Paul Task Force
as 0:2023cv01252
Plaintiff:
Lachica Ousley and Kevin K. White
Defendant:
St. Paul Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kue et al v. Waldmiller et al
as 1:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
Eleanore Kue, Simon Kue and His Healing Hands Urgent Care Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Janice Waldmiller, Jamie Ousley, Lindsey Malocu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01744
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. Maier et al
as 5:2018cv00687
Defendant:
George T. Maier, Stark County Commissioners, Chane Cline and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Dwayne King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
