Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clervrain et al v. Golden et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ashly Carmelle Dorsainville, Fridelyne Maisoneuve and others
Defendant:
Scott Golden, Jennifer Little, Pat Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02941
Defendant:
JESSICA HURST, MATTHEW ZECHMAN, JOHN SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEAL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02926
Defendant:
OFFICER PANARA, JOHN DOES, OFFICER WONG and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEAL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 10-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Martin v. Liberty County et al
as 4:2009cv00166
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn A. Martin, Gwendolyn A. Martin, Gwendolyn A. Martin and others
Defendant:
Liberty County, Liberty County Board of Commissioners, John D. McIver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 09-6082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 09-5093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Earl v. Ballew et al
as 4:2007cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Earl
Defendant:
Kevin Ballew, Phil Bredesen, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferrell v. Seagraves et al
as 4:2007cv00035
Plaintiff:
David A Ferrell
Defendant:
Kenneth Seagraves, Mark Hillis, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
