Cases 91 - 100 of 168
Narviez Alexander v. Duane Graham, et al
as 13-15045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NARVIEZ V. ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
DUANE GRAHAM, JOSEPH HANSON and BEEBE CLARK
Jimmy Cantrell v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 12-3371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, Attorney General of Arkansas, City of Little Rock and others
Abreu v. United States of America
as 12-2466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, State of New York, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Abreu v. United States of America
as 12-2466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, State of New York, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Percefull v. Robertson et al
as 5:2012cv00171
Plaintiff:
Richard Percefull
Defendant:
Vernon Robertson, Mike Beebe, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Beebe et al
as 5:2012cv00137
Plaintiff:
Robert Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, David G Henry, Robert Dittrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarbrough v. Bilow et al
as 9:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
Lester Lee Scarbrough, Jr.
Defendant:
David M. Bilow, Richard M. Wentzel, Andrew Bouchey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beebe v. Chavez
as 2:2012cv00155
Petitioner:
Justin Wayne Beebe
Respondent:
F. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
