Cases 91 - 100 of 383
Samuel et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2021cv00430
Petitioner:
Amos Jayeola Samuel, Odunayo Ekundayo, Benoy Thomas and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Immigration Customs Enforcement, Daniel W. Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv21803
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pierre-Gilles v. Acting Attorney General et al
as 1:2021cv20866
Plaintiff:
Herby Yves Pierre-Gilles
Defendant:
Acting Attorney General, Officer-in-charge of Krome North Service Processing Center, Secretary of the United States, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Padilla v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv02195
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Unknown Wlazlak, Claudio Gerardo and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ceballos Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pierre-Gilles v. Akima Global Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv20716
Defendant:
Akima Global Services, LLC, Michael W. Meade, Larry Niedziakeck and others
Plaintiff:
Herby Yves Pierre-Giles and Herby Yves Pierre-Gilles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
