Cases 91 - 100 of 72,324
Rodriguez v. Keast et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Fernando Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Keast, Benson, J. Issacson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
JoAquin Hill
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Frisina et al
as 9:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
D. Frisina, S. Jackson, Phil Melecio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Eller
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Richard Williams
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evette Robinson v. Michael Williams, et al
as 24-1907
Plaintiff:
EVETTE ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS, JANE MOSKUS, BRAD ROGERS, Captain and others
William Cope, Jr. v. Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, et al
as 24-5496
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS COPE, JR.
Defendant:
LUTHER LUCKETT CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, et al., AMY ROBEY, Warden, PATRICIA GUNTER, Deputy Security and others
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01505
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, Ndze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Grimes et al
as 3:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Alvin E. Jefferson
Defendant:
Tammy Grimes, Captain Collins, C/O Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
William Morgan Reeves, III
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
