Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 231
Ashford v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2016cv00380
Plaintiff: Randolph Ashford
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashford v. Johnston et al
as 1:2015cv01714
Plaintiff: Anthony Ashford
Defendant: Cheryl Johnston and Tracy Lovely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashford v. Evens et al
as 1:2015cv01715
Plaintiff: Anthony Ashford
Defendant: Robert Evens and Tony Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon #145508 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02441
Plaintiff: Deniel Desmond Brandon
Defendant: Charles Ryan, Tara Diaz, Unknown Bertel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHFORD v. KELLY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02166
Plaintiff: Kenneth Ashford
Defendant: THOMAS H. KELLY, Richard K. Renn, Michael W. Flannelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Willis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2015cv04215
Plaintiff: Gregory McDaniel
Defendant: Kirk Willis, Jeremy Ashford, Jeffrey Westfall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashford v. Tanner et al
as 1:2015cv01011
Plaintiff: Anthony Ashford
Defendant: Mr. Tanner, Robert Evens and Mr. Dryder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashford v. Nordkind
as 1:2015cv00989
Petitioner: Anthony Ashford
Respondent: Lorraine Nordkind
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tant v. Frick et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv03001
Plaintiff: David Ray Tant
Defendant: William Frick , South Carolina Office of the Attorney General , South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHFORD v. KELLY et al
as 2:2015cv04174
Plaintiff: KENNETH WINSTON ASHFORD
Defendant: THOMAS H. KELLY, RICHARD K. RENN, MICHAEL W. FLANNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?