Cases 101 - 110 of 611
Abreu v. Lake
as 18-433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Mitch Lake, Director; Bureau of Mental Health Services, James F. Donahue, Deputy Superintendent for Mental Health Services; Marcy Correctional Facility, Justin J. Thomas, Superintendent; Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Haywood v. Illinois Department of Corrections Director et al
as 3:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
John D Haywood
Defendant:
Director I.D.O.C., Kimberly Butler, Dr. Finnerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Donahue et al
as 1:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Eric Swain Johnson
Defendant:
Kieran Donahue, Ward, Kiehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fiscus v. Schmid et al
as 5:2017cv00592
Plaintiff:
Robert Fiscus
Defendant:
Stephen Anderson Schmid, Michael Donahue, Nicholas Sutliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. GEO et al
as 2:2017cv01595
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Moses
Defendant:
GEO, Allen Correctional Center, David J Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Lake et al
as 9:2017cv01312
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Mitch Lake, James F. Donahue, Justin J. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv02426
Plaintiff:
Aaron E Young
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation , MTC Medical LLC , Neil Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donahue v. USA
as 3:2017cv02093
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joseph P Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James v. Doty et al
as 9:2017cv01145
Plaintiff:
Carlton M. James
Defendant:
A. Doty, Vincent L. Leon, K. Kavaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamal Hendrix v. James Cox, et al
as 17-17047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES G. COX, SHERYL FOSTER, RENEE BAKER, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
