Cases 101 - 110 of 233
Penny v. Hamilton County Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Brian C Penny
Defendant:
Hamilton County Tennessee, CoreCivic, Inc., Chris Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AJABU v. HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, et al.
as 1:2017cv01218
Plaintiff:
KOFI M. AJABU
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, KEVIN SCIONTI ESTATE (Deceased), ERIC K. KOSELKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallis v. Correction Corp of America et al (TV2)
as 1:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Benjamin T Wallis
Defendant:
Correction Corp of America, Correct Care Solutions, Christopher Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackwell v. Hamilton County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
George Jackson Blackwell
Defendant:
Hamilton County Jail and Jim Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettus-Brown v. Hamilton County Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown
Defendant:
Hamilton County Ohio and Hamilton County Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hamilton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
James D Smith
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff, Greer, Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Crow et al
as 3:2016cv01353
Plaintiff:
Richard Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Crow, Randy Cobb, Officer Kaleena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kidd-Littlebird v. Hamilton County
as 1:2016cv01151
Petitioner:
Roy-Edward Kidd-Littlebird
Respondent:
Hamilton County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Hamilton County Jail et al (PLR1)
as 1:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
George Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Hamilton County Jail, Hamilton County Officers, Ms Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIEL v. DREW et al
as 4:2016cv00763
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS D DANIEL
Defendant:
DARLENE DREW, HARRY S MATTICE, JR, ELEANOR L ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
