Cases 101 - 110 of 152
Anthony Threatt v. Unknown Thomas, et al
as 12-2469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN THOMAS, ARUS, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, named as Psychologist or Social Worker and UNKNOWN PARTY #2, named as Medical Doctor
Jones #223008 v. Buckholz et al
as 1:2012cv00929
Plaintiff:
Mark Jones #223008
Defendant:
Unknown Buckholz , Unknown Thomas and Thomas Parling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #223008 v. Buckholz et al
as 2:2012cv00353
Plaintiff:
Mark Jones #223008
Defendant:
Unknown Buckholz , Unknown Thomas and Thomas Parling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Threatt #182625 v. Thomas et al
as 2:2012cv00277
Plaintiff:
Anthony Threatt #182625
Defendant:
Unknown Thomas, Unknown Party #1 and Unknown Party #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wrays v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2012cv01469
Plaintiff:
Stephon Wrays
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , Joseph M Arpaio , Unknown Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. E.M.C.F. Security et al
as 4:2012cv00062
Defendant:
E.M.C.F. Security, Unknown Thomas, Unknown Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus G. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford #401838 v. Curtin et al
as 1:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
Antione D Ford #401838
Defendant:
Cindi Curtin, Unknown Sanders, Unknown Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon #308075 v. Benson et al
as 1:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Deontae Gordon #308075
Defendant:
Unknown Benson, Unknown McCarey, Amy Haske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gage v. Cain et al
as 3:2012cv00119
Defendant:
K. Benjamin, Unknown Bonnette, Unknown Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Wayne Gage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rozenman v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Rozenman
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
