Cases 111 - 120 of 470
Neal v. Hampton Manufacturing Incorporated
as 2:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
Joseph Neal
Defendant:
Hampton Manufacturing Incorporated, Ronald S Hampton, Sr., Washington State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA
as 1:2016cv00020
Petitioner:
David John Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Wilson
as 0:2015cv03758
Petitioner:
DS. John Smith
Respondent:
Denese Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Manz v. FCI Fort Worth et al
as 3:2015cv01697
SIS:
Lt. Buck
Defendant:
C.O. Cruz, FCI Fort Worth, Dr. Meisamy and others
Plaintiff:
Justin C. Manz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven McDonald v. James Edwards, et al
as 15-35668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES EDWARDS, M.D., Medical Director, WSP, F. JOHN SMITH, M.D., Physician, WSP, G. PIERCE, Disciplinary Hearings Examiner, WSP and others
Hill v. Silverberg et al
as 9:2015cv00971
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
Howard Silverberg, Kevin Nassiverd, D. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2015cv00374
Petitioner:
JOHN SMITH
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Belfield v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv01153
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Belfield
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Franklin County, Washington County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Varnell v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv05443
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lee Varnell
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Steven Hammond, John Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. The City Of New York, et al
as 1:2015cv04801
Defendant:
William P. Clemons, Florence Finkle, Joseph Ponte and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
