Cases 111 - 120 of 8,195
Thompson v. Pierre et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thompson
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, Jill Cuffaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Scott v. Rodriguez
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott
Defendant:
Deputy R. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Rodriguez v. USA
as 24-10704
Petitioner:
DANIEL A. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Evans v. Atkins et al
as 1:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Clarence Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. Atkins, C.O. John Doe 1, C.O. John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. ZACTECKY et al
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS L. RODRIGUEZ, SR.
Defendant:
ZACTECKY, LYTKE, MICHELLE STEAL COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oudekerk v. Eldrige et al
as 9:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Oudekerk
Defendant:
Eldrige and Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Pierre et al
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Kani C. Little
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, LaTonya Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rodriguez-Mendez v. Ellred,et al
as 2:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Rodriguez-Mendez
Defendant:
Dr. Ellred, Kerney, Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lora Mosquete v. City of New York et al.
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Richard Lora Mosquete
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Officer Rafi J. Rodriguez Joaquin, Officer Lejoe J. Endanattu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODRIGUEZ v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
JENHSEN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
DIRECTOR BOP COLETTE PETERS and WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
