Cases 121 - 130 of 133
ROWLS v. USA
as 4:2012cv00114
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ERIC RANNON ROWLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GAMBLE v. ROWLES et al
as 5:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL GAMBLE, JR
Defendant:
ROWLES and ZANVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nashaddai v. Slaughter et al
as 8:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Nydeed B.K. Nashaddai
Defendant:
FNU Slaughter, Jim Coats, Daniel G. Simovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joiner v. Gay et al
as 2:2010cv02349
Plaintiff:
Marvin S Joiner
Defendant:
John Gay, Ben Rowlings, Rick Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Steele v. Billy Rowles, et al
as 10-40830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY ROWLES, Individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Jasper County, UNKNOWN JAILERS, Indvidually and in their officail capacity as Jasper County Jail Guards and JASPER COUNTY
Smith v. Rowling
as 2:2010cv00679
Plaintiff:
Elijah M Smith
Defendant:
J.K. Rowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowles v. Trim
as 5:2010cv00570
Petitioner:
Mary B. Rowles
Respondent:
Ginine Trim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cantres v. Philipson et al
as 8:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Fernando Cantres, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Philipson, Jim Coats, Sgt. Depalma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantres v. Coats et al
as 8:2009cv02414
Plaintiff:
Fernando Cantres, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Coats, Captain Slaughter and Corporal Rowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Steele v. Billy Rowles, et al
as 09-40941
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES STEELE
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY ROWLES, Individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Jasper County, UNKNOWN JAILERS, Indvidually and in their officail capacity as Jasper County Jail Guards and JASPER COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
