Cases 141 - 150 of 2,552
Lane v. Martin et al
as 6:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mangon Lane, Sr.
Defendant:
Unit Mg Ms. Martin, Medical Services, Warden Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoxsey v. Scott County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lovell Hoxsey
Defendant:
Scott County Board of Supervisors, Tim Lane, S. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis Lane v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Clifford Gooden, III v. Scott County Prosecutors, et al
as 23-2378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott County Prosecutors, Robert Lee Cusack, Meghan Corbin, Judge and others
Clifford Gooden, III v. Brian Heyer, et al
as 23-2385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian E. Heyer, Attorney and Tim Lane, Sheriff
Clifford Gooden, III v. Meghan Corbin, et al
as 23-2380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Meghan Corbin, Judge, Elizabeth O'Donnell, Scott County Prosecutor, Chris Widmer, Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6534
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walker v. Weinman et al
as 1:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
De'Von L Walker
Defendant:
Robert Weinman, Cheryl Jean-Pierre, Jane Doe Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd Hammond v. James Green
as 23-5502
Petitioner / Appellant:
LLOYD HAMMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM LANE, Warden, Green River Correctional Complex and JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
EISENMANN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
GARY LANE EISENMANN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
