Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,204
Rogers #200836 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff: Rodney Dewon Rogers #200836
Defendant: Heidi E. Washington, Jeff Tanner, Wayne Thomas, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Annabel, II v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant: HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, official and personal capacity, named as Heidi Washington, JEREMY BUSH, Deputy Director, official and personal capacity, ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN MCKINNEY, official and personal capacity and others
Tanner v. Metabank (Pathward) et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff: Michael A. Tanner
Defendant: Metabank (Pathward), Internal Revenue Service, Pathward and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers
USA v. King
as 24-50354
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Tanner Lance King
Tabitha McKenzie v. Chief Judge, et al
as 24-10899
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: CHIEF JUDGE, CASEY T. BARREN and LISA TANNER
Bradley v. Tritt et al
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff: Brandon Bradley, Sr
Defendant: Kyle Tritt, Joseph Beahm, Jesse Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Samaniego et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff: Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant: Placido Samaniego, Jr., James Tanner, George W. McGlothlin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Kalla et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Timothy Wayne Littlejohn
Defendant: Dr. Ajai Kalla, Dr. Tabernik, Dr. Henie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodmore v. Tanner
as 2:2024cv11138
Petitioner: Jamar Levon Woodmore
Respondent: Jeff Tanner
Wilkerson v. Tanner
as 2:2024cv10767
Petitioner: Kyle Frederick Wilkerson
Respondent: Jeff Tanner

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?