Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Chapman # 229191 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01302
Plaintiff: James Ward Chapman, III
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson #235832 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01207
Plaintiff: Harold Edwin Ferguson
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2015cv00766
Plaintiff: Ryan Mitchell Sullivan
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Unknown Arriola, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Thomas Gallo v. David B Long We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00953
Petitioner: Andrew Thomas Gallo
Respondent: David B. Long
Walton v. Churnenky et al
as 2:2014cv00958
Plaintiff: Geary Wayne Walton
Defendant: O Joseph Churnenky, Michael B Bernays, James H Kemper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hawes v. Grandlienard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv00889
Petitioner: Andrew Thomas Hawes
Respondent: Kent Grandlienard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gallo v. Long
as 3:2014cv00657
Petitioner: Andrew Thomas Gallo
Respondent: David B. Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Nooth et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00064
Defendant: Darrin Christofferson, Dr. Evans, Dr. Gulick and others
Plaintiff: Edward Andrew Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Nooth
as 2:2013cv02148
Respondent: Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax: Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner: Claude Andrew Thomas, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Nooth
as 2:2013cv00661
Defendant: Mark Nooth
Plaintiff: Edward Andrew Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?