Cases 11 - 20 of 110
RAHAIM v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAHAIM
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, ASHLEY MOODY, AKISTA ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguon v. Glynn et al
as 3:2021cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Mary Anne Glynn, Steven Roberts, John Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Knight v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv02408
Plaintiff:
Donte Ray Knight
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Corporal B. Brown and BCDC Librarian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00652
Plaintiff:
Jason B Brown
Defendant:
Indiana Depart Corrections and Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv02218
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hash v. Giacomazzi et al
as 5:2020cv01116
Defendant:
S. Lucas, C. Remillard, R. Persaud and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv04324
Plaintiff:
JASON B BROWN and SITTING BULL
Defendant:
FEDERAL MILITARY GOVERNMENT SECTOR PRIVATE ENTITIES CYBERNETICS GROUP TECHNOLOGIES, STATE OF INDIANA and MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv04325
Plaintiff:
JASON B BROWN
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT DETENTION CENTER ONLY and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2019cv00932
Plaintiff:
Jason B Brown
Defendant:
Madison County Sheriff's Department Detention Center Only and Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of Indiana et al
as 3:2019cv00928
Plaintiff:
Jason B Brown and Sitting Bull
Defendant:
Federal Military Government Sector Private Entities Cybernetics Group Technologies, Indiana State of and Madison County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
