Cases 11 - 20 of 691
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battles v. Pollard
as 2:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Battles
Defendant:
Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle v. John Doe Nurse et al
as 6:2024cv06191
Plaintiff:
Shaquill Battle
Defendant:
John Doe Nurse, J. Brooks, Insania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Hinds County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Paul DeAnthony Battle
Defendant:
Hinds County Detention Center, Tyree Jones, Hinds County Sheriff Officers and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Battle et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Deandre Rashawn Bass
Defendant:
Battle, Pullins and Cornett
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hiaasen v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Robert Brian Hiaasen
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Leland Beamer, John Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Cokely v. Lucretia Battles Smith, et al
as 24-10738
Plaintiff:
DONALD CHADWICK COKELY
Defendant:
LUCRETIA BATTLES SMITH, DRAKE THORNTON and STEDMAN SCOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
