Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Maris Powell v. USA
as 18-12146
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIS C. POWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Powell v. United States of America
as 8:2018cv00503
Plaintiff:
Maris C. Powell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
POWELL v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv09314
Plaintiff:
DEVON C. POWELL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. USA
as 1:2016cv01163
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Eric C. Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
ELLIS v. THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 7:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
RECKO M ELLIS
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, C POWELL and A DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Wyoming State Governor et al
as 2:2013cv00250
Plaintiff:
Ronald K Mack
Defendant:
Wyoming State Governor, Wyoming Department of Corrections employee, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. USA
as 1:2013cv02037
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tammy C Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McClelland v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden et al
as 2:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Aubrey McClelland
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden, Eddie Wilson, Wyoming Department of Corrections Lieutenant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
