Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Doe v. DeWees et al
as 8:2018cv02014
Defendant:
Michael Andrews, Unidentified contractor, Joyce Schaum and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
King v. Collier et al
as 4:2017cv01292
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr.
Defendant:
Byran Collier, Christopher Carter, C.S. Lapox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Dzurenda
as 16-3638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jermaine Little
Defendant - Appellee:
James Dzurenda, Comm. of CT D.O.C., Angel Quiros, Dist. Adm. of Dist. 1, Edward Maldonado, Warden and others
Boatright v. Kiser et al
as 2:2016cv00534
Plaintiff:
Earl Matthew Boatright
Defendant:
J. Kiser, R. Clary, Shawn K. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruggeman v. Applegate et al
as 6:2015cv01092
Plaintiff:
Garry Lynn Bruggeman, Jr.
Defendant:
C.M. Applegate, C.S. Stallings, D. Delong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Baker et al
as 3:2014cv00386
Defendant:
David Armstead, Renee Baker, Joseph Baros and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akinsanya Idrissa El v. Judge Beverly T. Beal
as 14-7036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKINSANYA IDRISSA EL, ex rel. Carl Lorice Brewton, Authorized Representative
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE BEVERLY T. BEAL, Judge, EDWIN D. CLONTZ, Magistrate and CHRIS S. EBY, Detective, C.S. #2603-APD
Ceparano v. Suffolk County
as 14-311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony J. Ceparano
Defendant / Appellee:
Suffolk County, New York, Steve Levy, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Ceparano v. Suffolk County
as 14-311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony J. Ceparano
Defendant - Appellee:
Suffolk County, New York, Steve Levy, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Dease v. Koehn et al
as 3:2013cv00609
Defendant:
Doctor Bannister, C.S. Chardin, D.A. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Wess Dease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
