Cases 11 - 20 of 331
(PC) Cato v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2023cv02560
Plaintiff:
Fredrick S. Cato
Defendant:
Hernandez, Her and Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Timothy Shawn Cato
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Cato v. Pohovich et al
as 2:2023cv01903
Plaintiff:
Fredrick S. Cato
Defendant:
S. Pohovich, Best, J. Georgette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Pedro et al
as 6:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Henry Cato, Jr.
Defendant:
O. Pedro, Cori Brown and Kelli J. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Richland County et al
as 8:2023cv02963
Plaintiff:
Raekwon Cortez Ford
Defendant:
Richland County, Tyrel Cato, FNU Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02300
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02291
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02282
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Jeremiah Hoskins, DeMarcus Bush and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02284
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
