Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 258
Chan et al v. US Attorney Office of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv12385
Plaintiff: Schultz Chan and Songjiang Wang
Defendant: US Attorney Office of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. Roon
as 1:2023cv02498
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: No Named Defendant, Attorney General State of Colorado, Chan Moi Roon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oiler v. LeMaster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv00090
Petitioner: David Channing Oiler
Respondent: Warden LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Elyas v. Chan
as 1:2023cv01212
Plaintiff: Sameer Mohamed Elyas
Defendant: Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. Tatoya et al
as 1:2023cv02314
Petitioner: Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent: Mo Tatoya, Michael Dugo, Punjwanj and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Christensen et al
as 3:2023cv00585
Plaintiff: Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant: Derek Christensen, Galipeau and Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Christensen et al
as 2:2023cv00209
Plaintiff: Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant: Derek Christensen, Galipeau and Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff: Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant: Galipeau, Gann and Indiana Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2023cv00582
Plaintiff: Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant: Galipeau, Gann and Indiana Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. Fischer et al
as 1:2023cv01412
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: Fischer, Hackler and George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?