Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Ellis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2012cv01117
Plaintiff:
David Ellis
Defendant:
Michael Phillips, J Freeman and Carla Payne Wendborn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles O'Neil v. Marty Anderson
as 11-7490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD O'NEIL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTY ANDERSON, DOMINIC MCLAIN, KENNETH KAISER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID ELLIS, ROBIN FRANCO and others
Avery Souffrant v. David Elli
as 10-15592
Petitioner - Appellant:
AVERY SOUFFRANT
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID ELLIS
Larry Bynum v. FNU Slagel, et al
as 10-6293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY J. BYNUM
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU SLAGEL, FNU BOWMAN, DAVID ELLIS, Chief Psychologist, F.C.I. Beckley and others
Marston v. Cook, et al
as 10-2093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMIE R. MARSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTIN COOK, US Probation Officer, US Probation Office-District of NH, US PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT, District of New Hampshire, U.S. Attorney's Office-District of New Hampshire and DAVID ELLIS
Ellis v. Estep, et al
as 10-1295
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
AL ESTEP, Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility and JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Brown v. Thorton, et al
as 10-11473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
THORTON, CO II, TORINO, Nurse, DONAHUE, Nurse and others
Souffrant v. Ellis
as 1:2009cv23183
Plaintiff:
Avery Souffrant
Defendant:
David Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Bynum v. FNU Slagel, et al
as 09-6138
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY J. BYNUM
Respondent - Appellee:
FNU SLAGEL, FNU BOWMAN, DAVID ELLIS, Chief Psychologist, F.C.I. Beckley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
