Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Christopher G Valencia v. Dennis P O Connell
as 8:2014cv01739
Defendant: Dennis P O Connell
Plaintiff: Christopher G Valencia
SUMTER v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA. et al
as 2:2014cv05692
Plaintiff: JOHN WM. SUMTER
Defendant: THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA., CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, CHAINBERLANDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah-Bey v. Sloan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00199
Petitioner: Ra Horakhty Ra'el Allah-Bey
Respondent: Brigham Sloan, Gary C. Mohr, John R. Kasich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ceparano v. Suffolk County
as 14-311
Plaintiff - Appellant: Anthony J. Ceparano
Defendant - Appellee: Suffolk County, New York, Steve Levy, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Ceparano v. Suffolk County
as 14-311
Plaintiff / Appellant: Anthony J. Ceparano
Defendant / Appellee: Suffolk County, New York, Steve Levy, Suffolk County Police Department and others
Rasheed-El v. Rothergy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02283
Plaintiff: Abdulaleem Rasheed-El
Defendant: Christopher Rothergy, Dennis P. Will, Chris A. Pyanowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Glick v. Kim Baskins, et al
as 13-3146
Plaintiff - Appellant: DENNIS P. GLICK
Defendant - Appellee: KIM BASKINS, BRAD THOMAS, ANTHONY WILLS and others
Boykin v. Holding et al
as 5:2013ct03208
Plaintiff: Walter D. Boykin, Jr.
Defendant: George E.B. Holding, Jim Johnston, Lucy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. COHEN
as 2:2013cv01487
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN WM. SUMTER
Respondent: DENNIS P. COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WILSON v. COHEN
as 2:2012cv05526
Petitioner: ROBERT WILSON
Respondent: DENNIS P. COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?