Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Domino v. USA
as 1:2017cv00779
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Domino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raggs v. Lawson
as 3:2015cv00526
Plaintiff:
Erique Dominoe Raggs
Defendant:
Julie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raggs v. Lawson
as 3:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
Erique Dominoe Raggs
Defendant:
Julie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fludd v. Fischer et al
as 6:2015cv06418
Plaintiff:
Jovan Fludd
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Anthony J. Annucci, Thomas Sticht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. South Carolina Dept of Mental Health et al
as 5:2014cv04541
Plaintiff:
Andrew Blackmon
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Mental Health, Jeffrey Musick, Mark Domino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nova v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 6:2014cv06235
Plaintiff:
Julio Nova
Defendant:
Kirkpatrick, Keenan, Will and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Domino v. Cain et al
as 2:2014cv00870
Plaintiff:
Landis Domino
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Domino v. Wall
as 3:2013cv30196
Petitioner:
Kim Domino
Respondent:
Joshua Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Prince
as 2:2009cv01964
Plaintiff:
Domino Johnson
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hamilton, et al v. Schiro, et al
as 08-30766
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOUIS HAMILTON, FLOYD DOMINO and EDWIN BROWN, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Movant - Appellant:
BOBBY JINDAL, Governor of State of Louisiana, ALAN LEVINE, Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals and JIMMY LEBLANC, Secretary of Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections
Defendant - Appellee:
MARLIN N GUSMAN, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Orleans Parish
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
