Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Watson v. Bloom et al
as 0:2021cv60192
Defendant:
Judge Peter T. Fay, Jill Pryor, William Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
Todd E. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUGATE v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2020cv02361
Defendant:
SARA SCOTT, PIERCE, STACIE HOWARD and others
Plaintiff:
DALE RAY FUGATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beland v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2020cv03006
Defendant:
Glenda Williams, Tiffany Lattimore, Theodolph Jacobs and others
Plaintiff:
Brianna Lynn Beland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unassigned
as 1:2019cv06985
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr. and Unassigned
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul and Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv05764
Defendant:
Ofc. Cooper and Chicago Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Jerome E Watson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt v. Northeast Regional Health Services Administrator et al
as 0:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Jose A. Santana, Special Agent-In-Charge, FCC - Ashland, KY., Chief Psychologist, FCC/FPC/FCI - Ashland, KY and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Belt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv02180
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Sgt. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv13582
Plaintiff:
JERRY RAY BELT
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NORTHEAST REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MANNS v. SIMS et al
as 1:2017cv03815
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. MANNS
Defendant:
T. SIMS, T. HOEY, RAVI SOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Lee et al
as 1:2017cv03669
Plaintiff:
Theowannis E. Watson
Defendant:
Durand Lee, Erik Shearer and Undercover Officer on the arrest report CB#19385099
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.