Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Anthony v. Rochester General Hospital et al
as 6:2022cv06372
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Anthony
Defendant:
Rochester General Hospital, Farhad Abtahian, MD, Jeremiah Depta, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conquistador v. Cook
as 22-1669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jean K. Conquistador
Defendant / Appellee:
Rollin Cook, Commissioner, In their individual & official capacity, Medical Doctor, Garner C.I., In their individual & official capacity., Egan, In their individual & official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Diomande v. Solomon et al
as 9:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Khaleed Diomande
Defendant:
Gabriel Solomon, Caleb Gomes and Ms. Brook Blaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomes v. USA
as 3:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Anthony Santos Gomes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Holt v. Gomes et al
as 6:2021cv01885
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lee Holt
Defendant:
Jeriel Gomes, William Young and Mason Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Powell v. Lynch et al
as 2:2021cv00782
Defendant:
Pierce, J. Lynch, Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Randolph Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacques v. Gomes et al
as 3:2021cv00804
Defendant:
Wilbur, Colour, Forrest and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Jacques
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Powell v. Gomes et al
as 2:2021cv00781
Defendant:
K. Hudspeth and Gomes
Plaintiff:
Adam R. Powell and Adam Randolph Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Briones Gomes v. The United States Government
as 5:2021cv00031
Defendant:
The United States Government, Federal Bureau of Prisons and The Justice Dept
Plaintiff:
William Briones Gomes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
