Cases 11 - 20 of 817
Kilgore v. Goodman
as 9:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Steven M. Kilgore
Respondent:
D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dove v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dove
Defendant:
D.O.C.C.S., Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Greene Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman, Alvin v. Dade Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv21327
Plaintiff:
Alvin Goodman
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke, D. Goodman and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Marvin Banks, Running River, Dale Arnold and others
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, Head Chaplain Henry Hansard, Tracy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Semezier v. Hannar et al
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Marc Semezier
Defendant:
FNU Hannar, FNU Goodman and Deputy FNU Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Semezier v. Hannar et al
as 5:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Marc Semezier
Defendant:
FNU Hannar, FNU Goodman and Billy Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Avalos et al
as 4:2024cv04047
Plaintiff:
David Wilkerson
Defendant:
. Avalos, . Sheaff and . Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tervin Goodman v. Warden of Broad River CI
as 24-6149
Petitioner:
TERVIN GOODMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Smith v. Goodman
as 2:2024cv01353
Petitioner:
Jua Smith
Respondent:
Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
