Cases 11 - 20 of 98
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Frazier v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 23-6359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ANIBAL HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, D.P., a minor, by and through his next friend and guardian K.P. and others
Plaintiff:
DONNELL DAVIS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, LESLIE SHARP, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ELMER LAGUAN-SALINAS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND, CORENNE LABBE, in her official capacity as Director of the Prince George's County Department of Corrections, JEFFREY LOGAN, in his official capacity as Division Chief of the Prince George's County Population Management Division and others
Defendant:
LAKEECIA RENEE ALLEN, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County, BRYON BEREANO, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County, JOHN BIELEC, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County and others
Dilnessa v. O'Brien, et al
as 4:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Ayalneh Dilnessa
Defendant:
Kelly S. O'Brien, Butte County Public Guardian, Butte County Department of Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vyas v. Sofinski et al
as 7:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tarun Kumar Vyas
Defendant:
Stephen R. Sofinski, Derek Whetzhel, Sheron Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2022cv08447
Defendant:
Westchester County Health Care Corporation, County Of Westchester, Westchester Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Baker, Gail Baker and Eric Baker, By Guardian ad Litem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elizabeth Krakauer v. Nicholas Jacobellis, et al
as 22-16358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH ANN KRAKAUER I, ndividually and as guardian of: on behalf of Brandon Gabriel Goodwin
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS JACOBELLIS, in his individual and official capacities - husband, JACOBELLIS, Unknown; named as: Jane Doe Jacobellis - wife, RYAN SHERF, in his individual and official capacities - husband and others
Holmes v. Guardian Brevard Newsletter
as 6:2022cv01514
Plaintiff:
Jariel Quntia Holmes
Defendant:
Guardian Brevard Newsletter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Edwards, et al
as 3:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
ALEX A., by and through his guardian, Molly Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Molly Smith
Defendant:
GOVERNOR JON BEL EDWARDS, in his official capacity as Governor of Louisiana, WILLIAM SOMMERS, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the Office of Juvenile Justice, JAMES M. LEBLANC, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Guardian Brevard
as 6:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
Jariel Q. Holmes
Defendant:
Guardian Brevard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lose, Jr. v. Stephens et al
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Robert William Lose, Jr.
Defendant:
Jennifer Stephens, West Virginia Deparment of Human Health and Resources, Guardian ad litem Kristen Antolini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
