Cases 11 - 20 of 476
Hatcher v. Florida Civil Commitment Center et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S Hatcher
Defendant:
Florida Civil Commitment Center, Jon Carner, Robert Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. KEY et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant:
DANIELLE MARIE KEY, CHRISOTPHER HELMS, J HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. USA
as 5:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Abby Leigh Hatcher
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meade v. Wexford Health et al
as 7:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Evan Hatcher Meade
Defendant:
Wexford Health, Lavina Mullins, Margie Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatcher v. Cardenas et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Daniel William Cardenas, Mark R. Ambrose, Jr. and Lisa Haskins Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. USA
as 5:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Abby Leigh Hatcher
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Timothy Reeves v. Shay Hatcher, et al
as 24-10063
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY REEVES
Defendant:
SHAY HATCHER, PERRY, FIELDS and others
Dunn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
John O. Dunn, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joseph Burnette, Mr. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page (PS) v. Boggess et al
as 1:2023cv03431
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Page
Defendant:
Joshua Boggess, Waseline, Rabas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
