Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Liggins v. City of Chicago Police Departments et al
as 1:2020cv02892
Defendant: KJ McCann, BJ Healy, City of Chicago Police Departments and others
Plaintiff: Christian Liggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Talavera v. Stebbins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00580
Defendant: A. Lucas, D. Stebbins, H. Hanzak and others
Plaintiff: Fernando Talavera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00146
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Haro-Arce v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00113
Respondent: David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Jose Miguel Haro-Arce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony Raye Hoskins, Sr. v. V. Haro et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01070
Respondent: V. Haro, Lugo and J. Varela
Petitioner: Anthony Raye Hoskins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Haro et al
as 3:2020cv00161
Plaintiff: Anthony Raye Hoskins, Sr.
Defendant: J. Varela, V. Haro and Lugo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC)Thomas v. Pfeiffer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01489
Defendant: Contance Waddle, Ralph Diaz, S. Duncan and others
Plaintiff: Edward Thomas and Edward N. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haro v. USA
as 1:2019cv01035
Petitioner: Javier Haro
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Haro v. Paul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00514
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Warden David Paul
Plaintiff: Javier Haro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Renan R. Haro v. Raythel Fisher
as 2:2018cv09547
Petitioner: Renan Roman Haro and Renan R. Haro
Respondent: Warden Raythel Fisher and Raythel Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?