Cases 11 - 20 of 446
Tinch v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Tekoa Ouatrell Tinch
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pelko v. Stith et al
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Pelko and John D Pelko
Defendant:
Judge David Stith, Sheriff J.C. Hooper, Nueces County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickey v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Douglas Dickey
Defendant:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper and Nueces County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamze v. Morgan et al
as 3:2023cv01394
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
Morgan, J.C. Walker, Rathel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Fitzgerald et al
as 3:2023cv06256
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
Lisa Fitzgerald, Bridget S. Bade, Kenneth K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00771
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Franklin
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval and D.O.J. (FBOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hamze v. Morgan et al
as 5:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Hamze
Defendant:
FNU Morgan, J.C. Walker, FNU Rathel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
Director Michael Carvajal, Doe 1, K. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders et al. v. Summit County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 5:2023cv01923
Plaintiff:
J.C. Sanders and Lachanda Gales
Defendant:
Summit County Sheriff's Office and Sheriff Breedan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gales et al. v. Porteus et al.
as 5:2023cv01942
Plaintiff:
Lachanda Gales and J.C. Sanders
Defendant:
Jack Porteus and National Asset Recovery Specialists, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
