Cases 11 - 20 of 2,462
Davis v. Officer John Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Officer Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milons v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04620
Plaintiff:
Deandree Milons
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Correctional Sergeant Williams and John/Jane Doe #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barmore v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Barmore
Defendant:
P. Myers, Stevens, M Foureh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. LETIZIO et al
as 2:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR LETIZIO, E. CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mrozek v. Eaton et al
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Doe 1
as 3:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gully
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
K. D. H.
Defendant:
Boone County, Missouri, Daymon Reynolds, Christie McCalebb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
