Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Stinson v. Fowlkes, et al
as 2:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Damon Keith Griffin, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Jenkins
as 1:2022cv03180
Petitioner:
Alvin Johnson and Alvin Stevenson Johnson
Respondent:
Sylvester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Jenkins
as 1:2022cv03148
Petitioner:
Alvin Stevenson Johnson
Respondent:
Sylvester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Jenkins
as 5:2022hc02139
Petitioner:
Alvin Johnson
Respondent:
Sylvester L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JOHNSON v. JENKINS
as 5:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
ALVIN STEVENSON JOHNSON
Respondent:
SYLVESTER L JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Brandon L Jenkins
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montoya v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2021cv23368
Plaintiff:
Carlos Montoya
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Sylvester L. Jenkins, Assistant Warden Jennifer Broton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Touizer v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2021cv22813
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Touizer
Defendant:
Warden Sylvester L. Jenkins, Merrick Garland and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stinson v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2021cv02148
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Arthur E. Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Cass County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00087
Defendant:
C. Bundge Bailey, Cass County Jail, Officer Allen Fetting and others
Plaintiff:
Ardell L. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
