Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Ruiz v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Michael Bailey, Lynnette C Kimmins, Ramiro S Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruiz v. Maede et al
as 2:2020cv02470
Defendant:
Jose Antonio Maede, Anna Isabel Gonzalez Villasenor, Fernando Macias Gernica and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Meza et al
as 2:2020cv02008
Defendant:
Jose Diaz De Leon Cruz, Rafael Coello Zetina, Claudia Marisol Lopez Galvez and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01779
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cano v. Circuit Court Of The State Of Oregon For The County of Multnomah
as 3:2020cv01413
Petitioner:
Ramon Reyes Cano and Martin Moreno Ruiz
Respondent:
Circuit Court Of The State Of Oregon For The County of Multnomah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruiz v. Marquez et al
as 2:2020cv01094
Defendant:
Luis Miguel Sanchez Hernandez, Maria Libia Gomez Padilla, Miguel Marquez Marquez and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00752
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moreno v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00997
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moreno-Lopez v. USA
as 3:2011cv02977
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Martin Moreno-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moreno Ruiz v. Jolicouer et al
as 3:2007cv00392
Petitioner:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Respondent:
Robert Jolicouer, Alfredo Campos, Institution Disciplinary Panel Hearing of El Paso Processing Center, DHS/ICE Departments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
