Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Green v. United States of America
as 5:2010hc02238
Petitioner:
Michael L. Green, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
HARMER v. MASON et al
as 2:2010cv01040
Plaintiff:
HARRY THOMAS HARMER
Defendant:
KEVIN MASON, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODSON v. MCVAY et al
as 1:2010cv01326
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Goodson, III
Defendant:
Catherine C. Mcvay , Michael L. Green, Jeffrey R. Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerard Pugh v. Michael Green, et al
as 10-11700
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERARD J. PUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL L. GREEN, Detective, GREG THOMAS, Detective and JOHN BEST, Detective
GOODSON v. MCVAY et al
as 2:2010cv00439
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. GOODSON, III
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVAY, MICHAEL L. GREEN, JEFFREY R. IMBODEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. McVey et al
as 1:2010cv00661
Plaintiff:
Taquan Cooper
Defendant:
Catherine C. McVey, Michael L. Green, Jeffrey R. Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Green et al
as 4:2010cv00017
Plaintiff:
Gerard J. Pugh
Defendant:
Michael L. Green, Greg Thomas and John Best
Green v. Stancil
as 5:2009hc02159
Petitioner:
Michael L. Green
Respondent:
Renoice Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. McVey et al
as 1:2009cv01735
Plaintiff:
Myles C. Long, Jr.
Defendant:
Catherine C. McVey, Michael L. Green, Jeffrey R. Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Green, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
as 09-7636
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. GREEN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and DARLENE DREW, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
