Cases 11 - 20 of 712
Maria Martin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-10677
Petitioner:
MARIA NAVARRO MARTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Navarro-Melendez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Oscar Orlando Navarro-Melendez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villasana, III v. Rivera et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Audencio G Villasana, III
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Rivera, Sgt. Brenda Unknown, Corporal Unknown Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villalobos Navarro v. USA
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Maria Josse Villalobos-Navarro
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hernandez v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Fernando Navarro Hernandez
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Erica Ceballos, (FNU) Barreti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maria Martin v. State of Florida
as 23-14187
Petitioner:
MARIA NAVARRO MARTIN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
(PC) Luevano v. State of California et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Luevano
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Prisons, Katleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolasco Navarro v. Clark County Detention Center
as 2:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Nolasco Navarro
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
