Cases 11 - 20 of 178
Williams v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02936
Plaintiff:
Shamark Williams
Defendant:
The City of New York, Police Officer Luis A. Segura, Garcia J. Osualdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo-Lovato-Segura v. Attorney General of Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv00751
Petitioner:
Marina Carrillo-Lovato-Segura
Respondent:
Attorney General of Colorado, Jefferson County Jail, Adams County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Segura Morales v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Jose Wellingt Segura Morales
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daniel Segura-Corro v. USA
as 22-6127
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL SEGURA-CORRO
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Israel Segura v. United States
as 22-3568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Israel Segura
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Pedro Segura, Sr. v. Tad Larson, et al
as 22-35977
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO SEGURA, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
TAD LARSON, Commander, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE - JAIL and JOHN DOES
Segura-Corro v. USA
as 5:2022cv00190
Petitioner:
Daniel Segura-Corro
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Segura v. USA
as 1:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Israel Segura
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Richard Segura v. Warden
as 2:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Richard Segura
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo-Lovato-Segura v. Eaton Metal Products et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Petitioner:
Marina Carrillo-Lovato-Segura and Marina Andrews-Pena
Respondent:
Eaton Metal Products, Tim Travis, Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
