Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50360
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
Warden Bergami, Warden Gonzales, Warden A. Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Smyth v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-7046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH ADGER SMYTH
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN STIRLING, Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director and CHELSEA JOHNSON, Program Manager, I.C.S.
Shunn v. IDOC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Forrest Glenn Shunn
Defendant:
IDOC, Warden Wesseler and Sgt. Smyth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery Grimes v. Roy Cheatam, et al
as 22-2128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY CHEATAM, WARDEN CIOLLI, UNIT TEAM MANAGER KNIKS and others
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Barnes et al
as 3:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Barnes, William Gore, Kenneth K. So and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Sileoni v. Richerson, et al.
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Richerson, Wessels, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colds v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
JALEN COLDS
Defendant:
WESTCHESTER COUNTY, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMYTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Venard et al
as 1:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anthony Shaw
Defendant:
Venard, Gaston, Grunwalnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
