Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Stephen Harris v. Christopher Epp
as 10-60446
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Koenig v. State of Maryland State House et al
as 1:2010cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce W. Koenig
Defendant:
State of Maryland State House, Office of the Public Defender of Maryland, Stephen Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Harris v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 10-60289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, MARGARET BINGHAM, RUFUS BURKS and others
Harris v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00120
Petitioner:
Stephen Harris
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Dale Caskey and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harris
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lanette Jordan, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harris
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Dale Caskey, Mattie Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Epps et al
as 4:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harris
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Pamela Robinson, James Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00594
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Petitioner:
Stephen Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
Alfred Garcia, Cornelius Alix, Anthony J Boyd and others
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Epps
as 4:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harris
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
